B2The Last Letter · Chapter 4 · Part 3About 2 min

The Date

Listen first. Answer six questions. Then explore the transcript.

01 · Before you listen

A few words to know

Explore the vocabulary
retention
the keeping of records for a period
acknowledgement
confirmation that a request was received
ledger
a book or system of financial entries
amended
changed after an earlier version
published
made available to readers
independently
without relying only on the same source

02 · Listen to the story

Follow the clues.

03 · Check your understanding

What did you discover?

Choose one answer for each question. Submit all six to see your score and unlock the transcript.

1. Why does Emma distinguish “being processed” from proof of receipt?

2. Why does Emma investigate the college’s record-retention rules?

3. What is the significance of Emma keeping Fiona’s name out of her request to the trust?

4. What does Emma recognise when rereading her 2011 article about Claire?

5. Why is Calum’s update not yet confirmation of a missing payment?

6. How should Emma treat Fiona’s instruction to inspect the original dated entry?

04 · Read & review

The transcript

Submit all six answers to unlock the transcript. You can then listen and read together.

Emma walked back to her hotel beside the river. She had hoped Fiona would explain everything. Instead, she had given her a way to ask better questions.

At the hotel, Emma read Calum's email again. The trust had said the payment was being processed. That did not mean the college had received it. She had to find out what happened after the instruction was made.

Emma asked Calum to give the college written permission to search its old financial records. She checked the college's rules and learned that some records might no longer exist. Even if the college found nothing, she would need to understand whether that was unusual.

She also wrote to the trust. She asked for the scholarship conditions and an explanation of how payments were approved, sent and confirmed. She did not tell them she had spoken to Fiona.

Malcolm Vale was still chairman, according to the website. His photograph appeared next to a message about honesty. Emma closed the page. A job title and a photograph did not tell her who had approved a particular payment.

Sarah called that evening.

“Did you find the answer?”

“No. I found a date I can check.”

“Sometimes that's better.”

“And the letter?” Emma said. “I still don't know who sent it.”

After the call, Emma opened her article from 2011. She found a paragraph suggesting that Claire had chosen to leave her family behind. Emma could not find any evidence for that claim in her old notes. She saved the article with her new research so she would not forget what she needed to correct.

She divided a page into two columns. In the first she listed facts: dates on documents, the people she had contacted, and the trust's published information. In the second she listed questions: where the money had gone, who had changed any records, and who had sent the letter.

Calum then emailed to say the college had received his permission form. It had not yet searched the records.

A second message arrived from Fiona.

Check the original ledger entry dated 19 November 2010. If it is different from the later summary, ask who changed it. I can't discuss this tonight.

Emma read the message twice. Fiona had not accused Malcolm of stealing money. She had not mentioned Claire. But she had pointed towards something that could be checked.

Emma wrote one final line in her notebook: 19 November 2010. Original entry. Who changed it, and when?