What Was Promised
Listen first. Answer six questions. Then explore the transcript.
01 · Before you listen
A few words to know
Explore the vocabulary
- corroborate
- support an account with independent evidence
- entitlement
- a right to receive a particular benefit
- retrospective
- formed while looking back at the past
- ceiling
- the highest permitted amount
- recollection
- a memory of a past event
- good faith
- an honest intention to tell the truth
02 · Listen to the story
Follow the clues.
03 · Check your understanding
What did you discover?
Choose one answer for each question. Submit all six to see your score and unlock the transcript.
04 · Read & review
The transcript
Submit all six answers to unlock the transcript. You can then listen and read together.
Ailsa rang at three. Her voice was cautious, but she did not sound surprised to hear from a journalist.
"I thought someone might ask about it one day," she said. "Not because I knew anything was wrong. Because the paperwork never made sense to me."
Emma asked whether she could take notes. Ailsa agreed, on the understanding that nothing would be published under her name without a further conversation. Emma repeated the condition aloud and wrote it at the top of the page.
In 2010, Ailsa had been offered support for a nursing course. The foundation's letter congratulated her on an award worth up to three thousand pounds. She had shown it to her mother and, for the first time, believed she could afford the travel and equipment the course required.
"How much did you receive?" Emma asked.
"Nine hundred pounds, in two payments. I still have the bank statements."
Emma kept her voice neutral. "Did the letter guarantee the full three thousand?"
"No. That's the part I want to be fair about. It said 'up to'. But when I asked whether there would be more, they told me the scheme had changed. Nobody explained how."
"Who told you?"
"Someone in the office. I can't remember her name."
Emma asked whether Ailsa had kept the original award letter. She had, somewhere in a box at her parents' house. She would look for it. Emma did not press her to produce it immediately.
"Did you ever speak to Claire Morrison?" Emma asked, then regretted how suddenly the name had entered the conversation.
Ailsa paused. "Once. She was helping at an information evening. She asked whether we'd been given the conditions in writing. I said yes. She told me to keep every page."
"Did she say why?"
"No. She seemed worried, but maybe that's how I remember it because of what happened later."
It was a distinction Emma appreciated. Memories could be shaped by the stories people heard afterwards. She asked Ailsa whether she would be willing to check the dates against her documents before speaking again.
After the call, Emma entered two figures in her spreadsheet: advertised maximum, £3,000; reported received, £900. She added a third column, evidence pending. Without the letter and statements, she had only an account given in good faith. Even with them, one student's experience could not establish what had happened to the foundation's funds.
She went back to the annual report. A note beneath the scholarship table said that some awards were subject to continuing eligibility and the availability of funds. The words might explain Ailsa's smaller payment. Or they might conceal an administrative failure. Emma highlighted the sentence but refused to choose between those possibilities.
A second reply arrived in the evening. This one came from a former student called Calum Reid. The surname made her sit upright, although there was no evidence he was related to Daniel Reid, the policeman whose name appeared in her old files. She would not turn a common surname into a connection.
Calum's message was short: I was offered help with fees. The college never received the money. I can show you the invoice.
Emma read it twice. She had a second account now, different in detail but pointing towards the same question. She asked Calum whether he would speak the next day and whether the invoice could be checked directly with the college.
For the first time, the list looked less like a publicity document and more like a set of promises that could be tested.