C1The Last Letter · Chapter 7 · Part 1About 3 min

The Missing Minutes

Listen first. Answer six questions. Then explore the transcript.

01 · Before you listen

A few words to know

Explore the vocabulary
qualification
A statement limiting how certain a claim is
attributed
Assigned something to a person or cause
shorthand
An abbreviated way of expressing an idea
custody
Responsibility for keeping an item or record
assertion
A statement presented as true
falsifiable
Capable of being tested and potentially disproved

02 · Listen to the story

Follow the clues.

03 · Check your understanding

What did you discover?

Choose one answer for each question. Submit all six to see your score and unlock the transcript.

1. Why does Emma reject the shorthand “Reid’s car”?

2. What is the main logical risk in Nora’s account?

3. What does the programme establish at most?

4. How does Emma interpret the missing online minutes?

5. What makes the anonymous message potentially manipulative?

6. What is the strongest interpretation of Emma’s final reflection?

04 · Read & review

The transcript

Submit all six answers to unlock the transcript. You can then listen and read together.

Emma reached the hire car she had collected after arriving by train, but did not turn the ignition. Rain moved across the windscreen in uneven sheets, erasing and restoring the Morrison house beyond it. She set her notebook beside her and reread Nora’s account before memory could smooth away its qualifications.

Claire had entered a vehicle without visible force. Nora had associated a similar dark car with the community hall and, on a separate occasion, a man she knew only as Reid. She had seen neither the driver’s face nor a registration number on the night in question. The chain of association was tempting precisely because it was so easy to mistake for a chain of evidence.

Emma put a line through the phrase Reid’s car in her notes. Even as shorthand, it attributed an ownership nobody had established.

Sarah rang while Emma was still working.

“You sound as if you’re writing the lead in your head,” her editor said.

“I’m trying not to.”

“Then tell me what you can verify, not what you suspect.”

“An eyewitness remembers Claire getting into a car. The rest needs checking.”

There was a pause. “That’s not a headline,” Sarah said. “Which is why it’s a reasonable place to start.”

After they hung up, Emma searched the digital scans she had kept from 2011. The surname Reid appeared repeatedly, attached to unrelated people and organisations. One entry stood out: an August programme for a Glenarraidh Education Trust event listed Daniel Reid among its community volunteers.

It was the kind of discovery that could mislead a reporter hungry for progress. The programme proved only that the name had been printed. It did not prove attendance, possession of a particular vehicle, or even that Daniel and Nora’s Mr Reid were the same person. Emma recorded the source, its date and those limitations together.

She made a verification plan rather than a paragraph for publication. Could the hall confirm bookings from that period? Had the trust retained its volunteer register? Was there a photograph whose registration plate could be read independently? And would James permit a single, carefully framed follow-up question to Nora?

While reviewing the trust’s digitised files, Emma came across an index to committee minutes. Entries appeared at regular intervals until late August 2011; none were visible for the weeks around Claire’s disappearance. An absence on a website was not evidence that meetings had ceased, still less that records had been deliberately destroyed. The original archive might simply be elsewhere.

She typed: online index incomplete after August; determine custody of originals.

A message arrived from an unfamiliar number.

Ask why the trust stopped keeping its old meeting records.

Its timing made her uncomfortable. The wording converted a question about an incomplete index into an assertion that record-keeping itself had stopped. Whoever had written it might possess useful knowledge, or might be trying to steer her towards a conclusion. Nothing in the message established access to her laptop or confirmed the claim.

She preserved the message with its timestamp and sent Sarah a factual account of its arrival. She would not reply before finding out whether there was anything to verify.

At last Emma started the engine. The wipers briefly revealed the empty road ahead. She had not advanced from uncertainty to certainty. She had narrowed the uncertainty into questions that evidence might answer—and identified one new attempt to shape the questions she asked.