B1The Last Letter · Chapter 13 · Part 2About 3 min

Delegated Authority

Listen first. Answer six questions. Then explore the transcript.

01 · Before you listen

A few words to know

Explore the vocabulary
request
To ask officially for something.
authorised
Officially allowed to do something.
separate
Not the same; kept apart.
reference number
A code identifying a record.
delegated
Given to another person as a duty or power.
illegible
Too unclear to read.

02 · Listen to the story

Follow the clues.

03 · Check your understanding

What did you discover?

Choose one answer for each question. Submit all six to see your score and unlock the transcript.

1. What new document does Fiona describe?

2. Who should authorise an exception request?

3. Why can Fiona not count the entries yet?

4. Does Helen agree to share more bank details?

5. Which step comes after authorisation in Emma’s model?

6. What is the title of the newly identified sheet?

04 · Read & review

The transcript

Submit all six answers to unlock the transcript. You can then listen and read together.

Emma found an email from Fiona Bell when she reached her desk. The records team had looked at another page from the trust's 2011 accounts guide. It explained what staff should do when a payment needed manual approval.

The guide said that a member of staff could request an exception, but a second authorised person had to approve it. Both steps were meant to be recorded with dates and reference numbers. The page did not name any particular person.

“Does this tell us who signed the payments?” Emma asked Fiona on the phone.

“No. It tells us how approval was supposed to work. We haven't checked the individual entries.”

Emma wrote down the difference. A rule about two people did not prove that two people had approved every exception.

Sarah came into the office with two cups of tea. “At least we can say the trust needed two signatures.”

“The guide says two separate roles,” Emma corrected her. “We haven't found two signed documents.”

Fiona had one more detail. The records team had seen a few entries with the words “approved manually”, but some of the neighbouring fields were difficult to read. Staff were making clearer copies before trying to count them. Fiona could not say how many entries were involved, who had approved them or whether any bank transfer followed.

Emma thought of Helen Ward's cousin. The family had a letter saying a grant was selected, but no confirmed record of payment. Emma would not try to connect that student to an exception without evidence.

In the afternoon Helen emailed. Her cousin had agreed that Emma could ask general questions about the payment process, but did not want to share more bank details. Emma thanked Helen and did not press further.

Sarah pointed at the notebook. “Selected, authorised, paid. And now requested?”

“Yes,” Emma said. “A request for approval is another step. We must keep each one separate.”

She drew four boxes and put an arrow between them. Beside the final box she wrote a question mark.

Later Fiona forwarded the title of a second office sheet: “Delegated authority — September 2011”. The team had not checked its contents, and she did not know whether it listed names or just job titles.

Emma read the words carefully. The anonymous caller had asked who approved the payments. Now there was a possible document about who had authority to approve them. It was a lead, not yet an answer.

She sent Fiona a simple question: “Can you confirm what the sheet describes, without identifying students?”

Then she closed her notebook. Tomorrow's work would begin with the rules, not with an accusation.