B2The Last Letter · Chapter 2 · Part 2About 2 min

The Promise

Listen first. Answer six questions. Then explore the transcript.

01 · Before you listen

A few words to know

Explore the vocabulary
assumption
something accepted without enough proof
scholarship
money to help someone study
recipient
someone who receives something
discrepancy
a difference between two figures or accounts
trustee
someone responsible for managing a trust
accountant
a person who works with financial records

02 · Listen to the story

Follow the clues.

03 · Check your understanding

What did you discover?

Choose one answer for each question. Submit all six to see your score and unlock the transcript.

1. Why does Emma put the anonymous letter under assumptions?

2. What does Emma recall about Vale’s public manner?

3. Why is the difference between twelve awards and fewer payments worth investigating rather than immediately condemning?

4. Which overlooked lead connects Claire’s concerns to the trust’s finances?

5. Why does Emma prioritise former recipients and financial records over the ceremony photograph?

6. What does Fiona Kerr’s appearance on the archived site establish at this stage?

04 · Read & review

The transcript

Submit all six answers to unlock the transcript. You can then listen and read together.

Emma opened a new document with two columns: facts and assumptions. She could not prove who had sent the letter, so she kept it among her assumptions. The foundation's published reports were facts, although their meaning was not always clear.

The Glenarraidh Education Trust had promised to help young people from rural communities continue their education. Its chair, Malcolm Vale, often appeared in photographs with students receiving certificates. Emma remembered him as a confident speaker who disliked detailed questions.

On the archived website she found a list of scholarship recipients and an annual report. Some links no longer worked. One page announced twelve awards, but a later report described fewer payments. Emma checked the dates and headings. An offer of a scholarship was not the same as money actually paid to a student. The difference could have a normal explanation, but it deserved investigation.

Emma found her notes from a café interview with Claire in September 2011. She had written that students were complaining about delayed payments. Claire had told her to ask who approved the transfers. Emma had ignored that information while pursuing rumours about Claire's private life.

She wrote a list of people to contact: former scholarship recipients, trustees and anyone who understood the accounts. A photograph from a scholarship ceremony told her very little. Records and witnesses might tell her much more.

At the bottom of the old website, she noticed the name Fiona Kerr, described as the trust's external accountant. The name was familiar, but Emma could not remember why. She searched the drive again.