The Promise
Listen first. Answer six questions. Then explore the transcript.
01 · Before you listen
A few words to know
Explore the vocabulary
- assumption
- something accepted without enough proof
- scholarship
- money to help someone study
- recipient
- someone who receives something
- discrepancy
- a difference between two figures or accounts
- trustee
- someone responsible for managing a trust
- accountant
- a person who works with financial records
02 · Listen to the story
Follow the clues.
03 · Check your understanding
What did you discover?
Choose one answer for each question. Submit all six to see your score and unlock the transcript.
04 · Read & review
The transcript
Submit all six answers to unlock the transcript. You can then listen and read together.
Emma opened a fresh document and typed a heading: What can I establish? She drew two columns, facts and assumptions. The letter belonged in the second until its origin could be verified. The foundation's published accounts belonged in the first, although their meaning remained uncertain.
The Glenarraidh Education Trust had once presented itself as a modest answer to a familiar problem. Young people from rural communities were leaving school with qualifications but without the money to travel, train or continue their education. The trust promised small scholarships and practical support. Its photographs showed smiling students holding certificates beside Malcolm Vale, the foundation's chair.
Emma remembered the launch. Vale had spoken confidently about opportunity, community and responsibility. He had been generous with quotations and impatient with detailed questions.
The archived pages contained a list of scholarship recipients, but several links no longer worked. An annual report gave a total for grants awarded, without explaining how much had reached individual students. Emma compared it with the figures mentioned in the notes from her interview with Claire.
One page advertised twelve awards; a later report listed fewer completed payments. Emma checked the headings again. One figure referred to offers, the other to money distributed. Neither explained whether any awards had been delayed or withdrawn. The distinction mattered.
The numbers did not match neatly. That was not proof of fraud; reports could cover different periods, and an apparent discrepancy might have an ordinary explanation. But it was enough to justify asking questions she should have asked years earlier.
She found a photograph from the ceremony in September 2011. Claire stood near the edge of the group, looking towards somebody outside the frame. Emma enlarged the image, hoping to recognise a face, then stopped herself. A photograph could not tell her what Claire had been thinking.
Her notebook offered something more useful. Under the date of their café interview, Emma had written: Students say awards announced, payments delayed. Claire says ask who approves transfers.
She had overlooked that line in favour of a more dramatic story about a disappearance.
A former recipient could tell her what had been promised and what had actually arrived. Emma remembered Claire insisting that the students mattered more than the speeches. At the time, she had mistaken the remark for impatience with publicity.
She put the photograph aside. It was tempting to look for secrets in every expression, but ordinary paperwork might prove more useful.
Emma made a list: scholarship records, trustees, bank transfers, former recipients. She underlined the last item. The people who had been promised help might know whether they had actually received it.
At the bottom of the archived site was an old contact address for the trust. Beside it, in smaller print, was the name of the organisation's external accountant: Fiona Kerr.
Emma recognised the name from a separate set of notes, but she could not yet remember why.
She searched the drive again.